A Vote for Productive Incentive

We hear candidate McCain argue that Obama's economic policy will deprive The People of productive incentive.

It is the classic conservative argument that productive incentive comes from the top down, from the managerial skill of organizing, or "factoring" resources to provide what we want and need. A progressive tax code, they argue, renders the capital necessary for factoring unproductive because it does not have the full capacity of the return on investment. It therefore will not be optimally invested.

Furthermore, they argue, a regressive tax code is only necessary to support the needless operation of government regulatory authority and wasteful welfare programs. The conclusion is that taxation is a non-productive incentive and should be minimized if not eliminated.

According to the conservative argument, a federal government was founded to ensure the sovereignty of The People; that is, to ensure eliminating the non-productive tendencies of consolidated power and wealth. The best way to provide society with what it wants and needs is to deconsolidate power and constitutionally endow The People with organizing its means.

That is exactly what Obama's economic plan will do: diminish the verified unproductive tendencies of consolidated power and wealth.

It is exactly what McCain's economic plan will not do: provide the means of The People the productive incentive, the opportunity, to provide what we want and need; what allowing for the consolidation of the capital will not verifiably do without punctuated periods of deprivational crisis like we have now.

If you want to vote for sure means of deprivcation and a non-productive incentive of the capital, vote for McCain.

If you want to ensure the free flow of capital and the maximum productive incentive that comes with it, vote for Obama/Biden.