Distribution of the Risk

Take a simple concept like, "tax cuts for the rich promotes economic growth."

With economic growth there is a diffusion of risk, but economic growth does not diffuse risk, diffused risk causes economic growth.

When wealth becomes so consolidated you can act without risk, "tax cuts for the rich" promotes economic crisis with slow to no growth, like we have now.

Ten years of tax cuts for the rich resulted in negative growth and the prospect for a lengthy recessionary trend--The Great Recession. Now, since Democrats have been unable to reverse the trend, which provides empirical confirmation of how "negative" growth is with a Republican regime, voters are flirting with a Republican agenda that provides tax cuts for the rich.

Not only is the tax-cuts-for-the-rich argument, and its newly found popularity (an implied consent) illogical, it is an empirically disconfirmed hypothesis.

The negative vote rigs the free-market of ideas (concepts) and working hypotheses (conceptual models) with a dummy variable--Republicans or Democrats. The practical model in operation effectively consolidates the risk, conserving its current value, which is why voters are "rationally" considering the Republican agenda, all be it an irrational alternative.

Pluralism is all about maximum, not minimum, distribution of risk, and voters are trying to effect a pluralistic outcome with a non-pluralistic organizational model that consolidates risk for elite management. That consolidated value (the power it accumulates), just like consolidation of economic value, is redistributed by the elite for public consumption, effectively--irrationally--rigging the market.

Non-pluralistic conceptual modeling, and practical organizational technologies modeled to fit the concept, cultivates irrationality. It is not the mass of voters--the mob--that is irrational, it is the elite "concept" of it, enabled by consolidation of the risk.

Enabling rationality requires deconsolidation of the risk, politically, economically, allowing for a distribution that empirically minimizes error (like tax cuts for the rich) and operationalizes the general welfare with a process of continuous improvement.