Disabusing the Hamiltonian Model

The Hamiltonian model operationalizes with the risk of loss fully assumed. With economic indicators in a confusing, conflicted array of sudden reversals and unexpected correlations (signaling the risk is going gamma), analysts that are concerned with tracking the extent of risk are compelled to consider worst-case scenarios.

Considering the extent of the risk is going gamma (a combination of a strong deflationary trend, a binomial political system, and strengthening global economic tension), and considering gamma risk is ontologically unavoidable without throwing out the model that assumes the risk, the military, for example, is predictably preparing plans to react to risk accumulating into a political proportion of general crisis.

While this is not a military problem, it is an economic organization problem, operationalizing military assets with conserving the risk assumed by the working model is a necessary condition for securing the general welfare. The model unavoidably relies on the force and legitimacy of public authority (with the risk of loss fully assumed).

The current working model needs to be disabused: the general welfare ontologically expected and verifiably legitimate with the risk assumed to the fullest extent (with the risk of gain fully assumed).

If the risk is fully extended in priority (deconsolidated), the crisis proportion abates. If the risk, however, remains consolidated with an ever-extended proportion of debt, the crisis proportion continues to accumulate for everyone. Controlling the extent of the risk is then a function of the general welfare. Risk is not a privately owned commodity to be privately managed by We the People if the risk is assumed consolidated in priority.

While the Tea Party is expected to vector debt reduction toward middle-class gain, if military analysts were to ask a political-economic risk analyst if the gamma will reduce, the answer is: Without accepting a new model that does not rely on an accumulating debt burden in the middle, the gamma risk is more likely to increase.